Comparison AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Google Cloud Run
Are you struggling with choosing the right platform for your next project? You are not alone! Comparing cloud platforms can be overwhelming, especially when it comes to cost and performance.
In this post, we will compare AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google Cloud Run, two popular platforms for container deployment.
What is AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a fully managed platform-as-a-service (PaaS) for deploying web applications. Elastic Beanstalk supports several languages and platforms, such as PHP, Node.js, Ruby, Python, and Go.
What is Google Cloud Run?
Google Cloud Run is a container platform that allows you to run stateless HTTP-driven containers on a fully managed environment or on a Kubernetes cluster. Cloud Run supports several languages and platforms, such as Node.js, Python, Java, Go, and .NET.
Cost
One of the primary concerns of any project is cost. Let's compare the cost of running an application on AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google Cloud Run.
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers a free tier and a pay-as-you-go pricing plan. The free tier includes up to 750 hours per month of t2.micro instances and up to 3GB of storage. The pay-as-you-go plan charges you for the resources you use, such as instances, storage, and data transfer.
For example, running a single t2.micro instance for an entire month would cost approximately $18.40.
Google Cloud Run
Google Cloud Run offers a pay-per-use pricing plan based on CPU and memory usage. The first 180,000 requests per month are free. After that, you will be charged $0.40 per one million requests and $0.000024 per CPU-second and $0.0000025 per GB-second of memory.
For example, running a container that receives 100 requests per second and requires 128MB of RAM and one CPU core would cost approximately $10.80 per month.
Overall, Google Cloud Run seems to be more cost-effective than AWS Elastic Beanstalk for small to medium-sized projects.
Performance
Another crucial factor when choosing a platform is performance. Let's compare the performance of AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google Cloud Run.
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk allows you to choose from several pre-configured environments based on your workload, such as a single instance, a load-balanced auto-scaling group, or a worker environment. Elastic Beanstalk also supports custom environments to customize your architecture.
Elastic Beanstalk is known for its ease of use, but some users have reported slow deployments and scalability issues.
Google Cloud Run
Google Cloud Run provides a fully managed serverless environment to run your containers. Cloud Run automatically scales your application based on incoming traffic and supports even scaling to zero.
Cloud Run also provides a feature that allows you to use continuous deployment, which automatically deploys the latest version of your code from a source code repository.
Overall, Google Cloud Run seems to have better performance and scalability features than AWS Elastic Beanstalk.
Ease of Use
Finally, let's look at ease of use when using AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google Cloud Run.
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is designed to be a beginner-friendly platform that simplifies the deployment process. You can deploy your application using a web interface, the AWS command-line interface (CLI), or the AWS SDKs.
However, some users have reported that Elastic Beanstalk can be difficult to use when it comes to customization and integration with other AWS services.
Google Cloud Run
Google Cloud Run is known for its ease of use and offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the deployment process. You can deploy your application using the Google Cloud console, the gcloud command-line interface (CLI), or Google Cloud SDKs.
Cloud Run provides straightforward integration with other Google Cloud services like Cloud Build, Cloud Code, and Cloud Monitoring.
Overall, Google Cloud Run is easier to use and offers better integration with other Google Cloud services than AWS Elastic Beanstalk.
Conclusion
In conclusion, AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google Cloud Run are both excellent platforms for container deployment, but they differ in terms of cost, performance, and ease of use.
If you have a small to medium-sized project and want to save on costs, Google Cloud Run seems to be the better option. If you prioritize ease of use and prefer integration with other AWS services, AWS Elastic Beanstalk may be the better choice.
We hope this comparison helped you make an informed decision. If you have any questions or suggestions, leave a comment in the section below.